Review of TQM Concept from Quality Gurus

Review of TQM Concept from tincture GurusAn extensive literature surveil is done to explain the concept of TQM, which is extracted from four-spot lumber gurus namely Deming, Juran, Crosby, and Ishikawa. Theories of these gurus be very immanent in understanding the concept of TQM. Principles and practices of these gurus atomic number 18 explained in fol impressioning section.2.5.1 Deming Approach to TQMThe main speculation of Demings approach is to create an fundamental lawal musical arrangement that leave alones faster cooperation and learning. This is to facilitate the unconscious process of guidance practices and implementation that winds to the apprise of the organizational process, yields, and employee fulfillment, which be all(a) essential to client joy (as cited in Zhang, 2000). fit to Rvans and Dean (2000), Demings doctrine is aimed to correct products and service by trim down the uncertainty and variation in design and manufacturing processes. Researc hers explained that high variation leave behind lead to inconsistencies in runance and as a result forget represent poor tonus.Deming invented the plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) cycle or commonly cognize as Deming cycle to relate the production of a product with the consumers desire and to utilize the resources within the organization to fulfill those needs (Goetsch and Davis, 2000). It is a constant cycle that requires the addition of parvenue fellowship.In addition, Demings 14 points of contestment withal received good reviews from the research society over the years. Ross (1999) indicated that a phoner must adopt the 14 points of his dust at all take aims of an organization. In retrospect, Dr.Deming has tailored some of the principles to integrate into the current management style of organizations. remit 2.4 lists out the Demings 14 points of management.Table 2.4 Demings 14 Principle of ManagementNoPrinciples1Create constancy of purpose toward the service of product s and service in localize to become competitive, stay in parentage, and provide jobs.2 conjoin the new philosophy. Management must learn that it is a new economic age and awaken to the challenge, learn their responsibilities, and take on leadinghip for substitute3Stop depending on inspection to achieve graphic symbol. Build in tincture from start.4Start awarding contracts on the basic of low bids.5Im locate continuously and forever the system of rules of production and service, to improve quality and productivity, and thus constantly reduce bells.6Institute homework on the job7Institute leadership. The purpose of leadership should be to athletic supporter tidy sum and technology work better8 film out fear so that eitherone whitethorn work in force(p)ly.9 describe down barriers mingled with departments so that deal rump work as a team.10Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and targets for the workforce. They create adversarial relationship.11Eliminate quotas and managemen t by objectives. Substitute leadership.12Remove barriers that rob employees of their pride of workmanship.13Institute a vigorous of program line and self improvement.14 sire the transformation everyones job and put everyone to work on it.Goetsh and Davis, 20002.5.2 Juran Approach to TQMJurans philosophy indicates that replete(p) character reference Management is a system or exertion that aims to delight customers, empower employees, incr backup the level of revenues, and reduce cost (as cited in Zhang, 2000). Demings, alternatively, focuses on the employees pride and their satisfaction. Juran call fors that top-down management and technical methods argon apt(p) to manage organizations (Ross, 1999). Based on a special report publish on Business week, an article entitled Dueling Pioneer, suggest that Juran part may be better than Demings theory in the long status, primarily owe to the fact that Juran has a broader concept duration Deming focuses on statistical process contr ol which is technical-oriented (as cited in Ross, 1999). In this study, Deming believes that customer focus is essential for a clubs success and quality is outlined as fitness for use. This is comprised of four categories which include quality of design, quality of conformance, availability, and field service.A famous prescription by Juran is quality Trilogy (A registered trademark of Juran Institute). Here, researcher illustrates that quality fuck be managed done three strategic processes fictional character Planning, fictitious character tempt, and Quality Improvement. Researcher articulates that problems argon traceable in an adequate planning process that impart be sent trough a quality control process where a particular problem give be executed. This evidently volition lead to the improvement process (Zhang, 2000). Figure 2.1 summarizes the three managerial processes.Figure 2.1 Juran TrilogyQuality Planningtack together quality goalsIdentify customers needsDevelop p roduct features that respond to the quality needs.Develop systems and process that allow organization to earn these features.Deploy the plans to operational levels.Quality ControlEvaluate quality performance. johnvas performance with goals.Act on the difference between performance and goals.Quality ImprovementDevelop the infrastructure necessary to produce annual quality improvements.Identify specific areas in need of improvement and implement it.Establish a project team with responsibility for completing each improvement project.Provide the resources, motivation, and prep needs by the teams to diagnose the causes, stimulate cosmos of remedies, and establish controls to hold the gains.Zhang, 20002.5.3 Crosby Approach to TQMCrosbys theory is considered as an important theory that raised to quality management. Researchers theory focuses on (1) Prevention of defect item (2) var. on psyche conformance (3) Clear customer focus and preparation for employee (Kanji, 1990). Crosby s theory also emphasizes on changing the organizational attitudes and behavior towards quality orientation. According to Taylor and Pearson (1994), Crosbys principles comprises of participation of all employees in the organization, stress on individual conformance, requirement and effective assortments of corporate culture and motivation. Apart from that, Boaden (1997) also stated four important quality concepts from CrosbyConformance to requirement is the definition of quality, non elegance.Prevention in the key to quality, not detection and assessment.Performance streamer if zero defects.Price of non conformance is the measurement of quality.In addition, Crosby believes that a play along would rather spend the lesser on prevention cost than keep back the cost of detection and failure. As stipulated by Deming and Juran, Crosby also stressed the vastness of quality improvement. Table 2.5 below listed out the Crosbys 14 steps to quality improvement.Table 2.5 Crosbys 14 steps to Quality ImprovementManagement perpetrationQuality Improvement TeamMeasurementCost of QualityQuality awarenessCorrection actionZero Defects planQuality educationZero defects dayGoal settingError cause outback(a)RecognitionQuality councilsRepeatKanji, 19902.5.4 Ishikawa Approach to TQMIshikawa is the quality expert that communicate TQM as TQC which is Total Quality Control. Since the terms management and Control are pronounced as Kanri in Japanese, it implies linguistic ambiguity between Quality Management and Quality Control in the in a higher place linguistic context (as cited in Boaden, 1997). Ishikawa is a quality tool expert that participated to develop tools such(prenominal) as the (1) Pareto Chart (2) Cause and Effect Diagram or known as Ishikawa Diadram (3) Stratification Chart (4) Scatter Diagram (5) Check Sheet (6) Histogram and (7) Control Chart (Evans and Dean, 2000)Ishikawa also stressed on continuous improvement and customer orientation where organization should k eep a track log on what their customer like, their tastes, and applications (Dotchin and Oakland, 1992). As stipulated by Zhang (2000), the six concepts of Ishikawa are described as followsCompany should put quality in the first place, not little(a) term additions.Company should focus on customer, not producer.Company should go past down the barrier of sectionalism of customer.Company should use facts and data to make presentation by using statistical tools.Company should apply the perplex functional management.2.5.5 Summary on Quality GurusBased on the concepts mentioned above, on that point remains on overarching idea that is dual-lane out by all of them, quality improvement. Quality improvement is necessary to lead a caller to success. Although all of the experts mentioned above possess various views on quality improvement, their intentions are the same. However, their fundamental approaches were slightly different. For instance, the approaches illustrated by Deming a nd Juran focus on detection and correction objet dart Cosbys theory emphasizes on prevention than detection. All in all, all four theories are widely accepted and are pacify being apply by umpteen organizations. Theories like Demings PDSA Cycle, Juran Trilogy, Crosbys 14 Steps to improvement, and Ishikawas diagrams are still widely used to explain the fundamental concept of TQM.2.6 Review of cognition Sharing experience as a resource of value creation, allows for portentous marginal rates of productivity., appreciating value with continuing use and sacramental manduction intimacy instead of depreciating value of tangible products or raw(a) resources(As cited in Yang, 2007)As illustrated in the above phrase, fellowship has to be shared out in order to maintain and appreciate the value it has to offer as it will depreciate and vanish over time. Knowledge manduction is a process where familiarity and skills are transferred from one individual to some other (Lin, 2007). Pan gil and Nasurdin (2005) posit that a number of discussions and research about friendship sharing is studies to grasp key element in cognition management. According to Chua, (2003), a healthful managed company can capture friendship from a segment of its organization, shared, and use in a completely different in its operations. Moreover, Nonaka (1994) stressed that the cogency of fellowship sharing is base on the willingness of an individual to identify the cognition he possess to the company and share it when it is required.However, fellowship sharing among companies end-to-end the world does not seem to be well accepted among employees and organizations. matchless of the reason has been notified where friendship is being codified and expressed, it is easy to leak the important codified cognition to the outside world and results in damages specially to an organizations competitive improvement, (Michailova and Husted, 2003). In addition, Mivhailova and husted (2003) con ducted a research the Russian and Chinese industries and order that the reason employees refuse to share their knowledge are due to (1) cost involved during knowledge sharing (2) the psychological fear that their personal value will drop after sharing their knowledge and (3) accepting and respecting a strong hierarchical and former power. Nevertheless, according to Arduchvili et.al (2002) on his empirical research, the inclination that employees do not want to share knowledge has nothing to do with selfish attempts but fear of misleading their colleagues. Despite the minor prohibit impact of knowledge sharing as above, many researchers wear proven that knowledge sharing will bring more benefits than harm (Yang, 2007 Chua, 2003) powerful knowledge sharing among organizational employees is useful to increase the long term sustainable competitive advantage (Lin, 2007 Yang, 2007 Ruhi, 2003) of the company as it promotes creativity and innovation (Hong et.al.2004 Patrick and Dotsika , 2007). This creates a place that generates information for decision making. New knowledge will indirectly form while the old knowledge is shared by means of discussion, meetings, and informal chats (Fernie et.al.2003). Ruhi(2003) discovered a number of benefit on effective knowledge sharing which includes (1) increase responsiveness to changes in the economic embellish (2) dynamic creation and application of custom content and (3) better manage business partner relationships. Additionally, a successful knowledge sharing milieu will strategically alter employee attitudes towards promoting willingness and reliability in sharing knowledge among employees (Connelly and Kelloway, 2003). As on that point are a myriad of benefits in knowledge sharing, motivational programs should held frequently to encourage employees to share knowledge (Ardichvili et.al 2002)2.7 Relationship between TQM Practices and Knowledge Sharing2.7.1 LeadershipLeadership in an organization can be defined as t he ability of a role thespian to influence a team of employees to follow his instruction or delegacys that have been assigned to them in order to achieve the goals or objectives that been preset by the company (Bounds et. al. 1999). In addition, Zhang (2000) and House and Dessler (1974) illustrated leadership to commit the following illuminance of visionCoaching managementChange of participation within companyEmployee empowermentPlanning as well implementationThey implementing the organizational change to provide guidance and recognize employees input such as ideas and tip as valuable resources. In parallel, a leader should move away from command managing to control oriented I order to make knowledge sharing successful (Macneil, 2004).Knowledge sharing in an organization does not occur automatically. Thus, a leader plays an important role to ensure that it materializes (Ellinger and Bostrom, 1999). As mentioned above, team members are likely to be recognized by leaders due to the ir contribution and information, and this will indirectly motivate them to share their knowledge with others (Srivastava et.al. 2006). A leader should also empower and encourage employees to participate in the decision making process and organize meetings where team members are unthaw to express their ideas and suggestions (Arnord et.al. 200). Through these avenues, employees will be aware that their knowledge shared is actually significant and indispensable. Moreover, Arnord et.al (2000) emphasized that leaders should always show censer to his or her team members well being. By doing this, a connection of self-confidence is built between the employee and leader so that knowledge sharing will be easier to function. Based on the literature findings above, the following scheme has been proposed conjecture 1 Leadership is positively associated with knowledge sharing.2.7.2 Organizational CultureAs Gore Jr. (1999) mentioned in his research study, organizational culture is considered as key that leads to organizational success. It can create competitive advantage for a company by defining the boundaries of organization in a look which will help in individual fundamental interaction such as sharing ideas and suggestion (Kefting and Frost, 1985). Holistically, organizational culture in the context of knowledge sharing can be described as a cabal of theory, values, beliefs, ways of thinking, and acting that are shared by all the employees within the organization (Nor, 2005). In addition, researcher illustrate that a successful organizational environment is when the companys values are cultivated and glued into employees beliefs where their behaviors are derived from kindly pressure but not from formal procedures and policies.Kim and Lee Stipulate (2004). That there are three components in an organizational culture that cannot be unattended to affect knowledge management and his includes vision and goals, trust, and social network. As knowledge sharing is one of the key components is knowledge management, it is assumed that these three components are also significant. Clear organizational visions and goals will definitely help to encourage employees to share knowledge. This is due to the involvement and participation of employees that is essential to achieve the goals and missions of a company (ODell and Grayson, 1998). Alawi et.al (2007) and Von Krogh (1998) however, explained that interpersonal trust or trust between co -workers is very important in organizational cultures that have strong influence over knowledge sharing. Moreover, (Gruenfeld et.al. 1996) stated that the existence of trust among employees is necessary in order to respond openly and share their knowledge. ODell and Grayson (1998) also highlighted that social interaction between individuals or groups ids helpful in knowledge sharing when different kinds of perspective and knowledge will be exchanged and transferred during the interaction. Based on this discussion, organiz ational culture is linked to with knowledge sharing and a hypothesis is formed. venture 2 Organizational Culture is positively with knowledge sharing2.7.3 TeamworkIdeally, a company project would require a team of force play that work together to accomplish the project goals. Thus, the composition of the team is all-important(a) and leader needs to understand the abilities of each team member (Anderson, 1994). Generally, teamwork is defined as a work or project done by associates, where each member does a part in line with the efforts from subordinated in hierarchical levels (as cited in Macneil, 2003). However, Goh (2002) found that hierarchical levels of teamwork was obsolete and introduced a modeling termed as horizontal communication. This goes beyond technology and encourages cress functional teamwork in the organization that will lead to knowledge transfer and exchange. She explained that employees can easy communication using horizontal cross-functional collaboration. Like wise, Lu et. Al. (2006) verified that good teamwork should contribute to knowledge sharing.Although many academicians and researchers elucidate such as the increase in operations productivity (Kirkman and Rosen, 1999), improvement in the level of customer satisfaction (Kirkman and Rosen, 1999), enhancement of jobs satisfaction among employees (Wall et.at. 1986), and education of a better organizational commitment, there is one fundamental benefit of framework that they disregarded, and this is complementary to the team members knowledge (as cited in Zarraga and Bonache, 2003). This can be clarified by analyzing the study of Wright et. Al.(1994) that explains in detail the idiosyncratic knowledge that is relevant to another member of the team and is transferred from an individual to that particular person. When this occurs a synergy is formed and results in a rise of a new knowledge to a higher level called group knowledge where combinations of unique skills of each team member are consolidated towards achieving missions and goals.Nevertheless, the social dilemma theory explains that knowledge sharing might arise from a problem called public- goods dilemma (Cabrera and Cabrera, 2002). Researcher explains that when knowledge is shared by a volunteers contribution to a team, every member in the team will benefit from it, whether they have made a contribution or not. In order to solve this problem, the company should plan honor strategy where people who share their knowledge will be reinforcing stimulused. Therefore, a hypothesis is developed and stated as possibility 3 Teamwork is positively associated with knowledge sharing.2.7.4 Training and schoolingTraining and development is the development of new knowledge and skills as result of imparted knowledge (Goetsch and Davis, 2000). In relation to the context of knowledge sharing, Pangil and Nasurdin (2005) explained that training is crucial for knowledge sharing because it generates an opport building blocky f or people gain new knowledge and share that knowledge. The role of training and development is expended to provide an environment that encourages and facilitates employees to share knowledge within the company. As discussed in the previous chapter, trust and motivation are very important in knowledge sharing. Thus, Goh (2002) stated that training in experimentation can help overcome constraints such as lack of increase an employees job satisfaction (Barli et.al. 2005) and organizational commitment (Ahmad and Bakar, 2003). A formal and successful training will encourage employees to share their knowledge (Lamoureux, 2006).Some options for formal and development programs can stem from hiring trainers and facilitators to provide in -house development programs, outstation training for employees, and e-learning courses that are provided by service providers (Lamourex, 2006). Researcher identified that formal training requires the trainee to perform after -action reviews and give suggesti on. Thus, they will express, share and improve their knowledge to others during the training period. Apart from that, as the technology used is growing pervasively in todays corporate world, many tools are developed to faster information exchange. In this course, employee training is necessary get themselves familiarized the technological tools. Stoddart (2001) stated that a good internet management practice will improve the usability and knowledge sharing capability among employees. In addition, Curry and Stancich (2000) elucidated that knowledge sharing will only work if the culture of the organization promotes it and real time applications such as computer conferencing are used. However, the most important element in accruing new knowledge is pointless without training. In short, training aids to ease the process of knowledge sharing. Surprisingly, there have been limited empirical evidences to prove that training can affect employees to share knowledge. With that reason, a hypot hesis is formed.Hypothesis 4 Training and Development is positively associated with knowledge sharing.2.7.5 support system of rulesIt is irrefutable that a proper retaliate system in an organization is necessary to keep the working environment alive. In general, reward system comes in a monetary from or recognition which is awarded to employees that achieve the goals and mission that has been preset by the company. To elucidate, from a neurobiological perspective, it is a set of structures that can regulate and control behavior by inducing rewards. Pangil and Nasudin (2005), Mc Dermott and ODell (2001), and Sharatt and Usoro (2003) concord that a companys reward system can effectively motivate people towards knowledge sharing. Knowledge sharing is so important that companies today have included them into performance assessments (McDermott and ODell, 2001). Pangil and Nasudin (2005) describe two purposes of a strategic reward system. Firstly, employee will be rewarded by performi ng knowledge sharing practices in the organization. Secondly, incentives will be assumption to those who continue perform desirable practices.Reward system for knowledge sharing can be segmented into soul RewardGroup RewardIndividual rewards are self -achieved where the company will award the individual who puts the most effort to share knowledge. According to Bartol and Srivastava (2002), value pay plans are suggested in individual award system to assess the performance of employees in knowledge sharing. In other words, financial enticement is used to motivate knowledge sharing (Hall, 2001). However, recognition sometimes can be more valuable than monetary rewards. For instance, the recognition of a journalist, researcher, or lecturer is considered as a reward to them after their efforts for print and teaching where knowledge sharing has created provocative change in the mindsets of people. Conversely, as discussed in the previous section, reward system is obligatory to ensure t hat every member in the team contributes to knowledge sharing (Zarraga and Bonache, 2003). Group reward system is slightly different from individual system, where rewards will be given based for group performance (Bartol and Srivastava, 2002). They explained that reward for group consist of profit sharing, gain sharing and stock ownership plans. As discussed above, reward system are crucial for practicing knowledge sharing, thus, following hypothesis is formedHypothesis 5 Reward System is positively associated with knowledge sharing.2.7.6 Customer revolve aboutCustomer focus can be defines as the degree a company embarks to satisfy the customers needs and expectations in continues manner (Zhang, 2000). From a business perspective, it is a known fact that the customer solely determines the success of a company. To illustrate that notion, general Motors, AT T, and IBM had to reengineer their business function in order to meet the growing needs of their customers (Pinar, et.al. 2007) . Thus, customer needs and expectations are considered as the baseline for any kind of business. Liao (2006) explained that sharing information on customer needs among co-workers or leaders could from as a competitive advantage to company. Apart from that, fast learning and knowledge transfer from an individual to another is what an organization must perform in order to maintain the products and work ahead of the needs and expectation of customers (Pfister, 2002)How do we get as many people as feasible to create and transfer as untold knowledge as possible in the best way possible in order to have a positive impact on our customer. (Buckman, 2004)Buckman in his book Building knowledge Driven Organization cited the above statement and explained that the full involvement, commitment, passion, to share and use the knowledge among employees are essential to satisfy customers (as cited in Buckman, 2004). Furthermore, requirements of customer can be tackled easily when knowledge is sh ared among team members. For an instance, Fang and Tsai (2005) illustrate and example the intensive care unit is a place where fast decision making is necessary as patients lives are in danger. In this case, the customers need would be the treatment while the service team which includes surgeons and consulting doctors will share knowledge among themselves to make resourceful decisions to save a patients life. At present, there is a lack empirical research to examine the relationship between customer focus and knowledge sharing. Therefore, the following hypothesis is presentedHypothesis 6 Customer Focus is positively associated with knowledge sharing.2.7.7 Research FrameworkThe relationship between the six dimensions of TQM and Knowledge Sharing is shown by Figure 2.2 below. Formulation of this research framework was based on the hypothesis thats discussed above. In this research framework, TQM practices are independent variables and knowledge sharing is a dependent variable. This st udy will focus on the relationship of each TQM practices to knowledge sharing.Figure 2.3 Research FrameworkTotal Quality Management (TQM) PracticesLeadership (H1)Organizational Culture (H2)Teamwork (H3)Training and Development (4)Reward System (5)Customer Focus (6)Knowledge Sharing